Domain-Driven Design Community

Not dangerous. If they are out of sync in such a way that the command would break invariants, the command would be rejected/not be executed. What if the

If you are referring to your 2 entities Mission and Request, they should really be inside a single BC, not separate ones. At least that's what I think. enjoy,

so do i, for some reason i cannot attend :-( On Sep 4, 2010 4:39 PM, "Piotr Perak" wrote: ... I vote for that as well! ... Yahoo!

... I vote for that as well!

Hi Mosh, The thing is, if you want to deliberately execute a command on several aggregates, you normally want to know which ones, so what Greg proposes would

Hi Nuno, Thank you very much for taking the time and explaining things deeply. You opened my eyes on a lot of things. :) So, just to make sure I haven't

And what the objects returned from the read side are not in sync with my master database? This way I'm executing commands on data that is not necessarily up to

Thanks Vaughn. I'll have a look. Mosh

Hi Sebastian, I view Shared Kernel as something to be avoided if possible. It's like a library concept and I don't understand most of the time how you'd have a

Hi Greg, As you know I've been always a fan of Collaboration design patterns (SOM) and DNC archetypes. The concept Aggregates always set me back as I never had

Hi Vaughn, Thanks for the references. As anyone in here I've read the section but it's always good to get a memory refresh :) My intention was about

Hi Brian, I found this post amusing simply because it has been my experience with DDD as well --- no definitive answer. I guess anything goes. ... It depends

I think the 'real' world, with physical objects is quite acid at the speeds that we are used to, but beyond that, all bets are off.. :) And most things we

"The real world is pretty ACID." citing? There are hundreds if not thousands of research papers, articles, etc that say the opposite of this. Here is one

... An simple example. Product and Order, two entities belonging to two distinct Aggregates. We then serve a product the Order in the form of a value object

Hi, ... If you mean appear as part of, then NO. If you mean appear by materializing it as Value Object the yes. Does this help? Cheers, Nuno

Hi Sebastian, I hope you don't mind jumping in. ... Yes. Time (domain time). ... The real world is pretty ACID. ... The real world is fully consistent! THERE

Hi Mosh, You may find this useful: http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/domaindrivendesign/message/19600 More to your question, on p383 note the closing

Hi Sebastian, Thanks for bringing up the small BC again. I meant to comment on that, too. Maybe you already know, but there is a pattern in the blue book that,

Every time I think I get DDD, posts pop up that tell me I've got it all wrong. Then deeper in the thread the ambiguity of proper DDD pops up again. I also